Home arrow In the News arrow Push for mill baseline study echoing in forum
Main Menu
Home
Take Action!
Search
About Us
In the News
The Crofton Mill
Air Pollutants
Contact Us
Links
Press Centre
Documents and Reports
CACG Newsletter
Letters
Toxic Legacy of Federal Neglect
Pulp Pollution Primer
RWDI Peer Review
Senes Peer Review
Regulations?
Jacques Whitford Study
Air Quality Reports
Paprican Study on Dioxins
Interbeing and Paper
Risk Assessment
Transcripts
Best Technology for P&P:EC
Push for mill baseline study echoing in forum PDF Print E-mail
Sep 28 2005

By Peter Rusland
News Leader

Demands for far more study of health risks from Crofton pulp mill pollutants are slated for debate at October's Community Advisory Forum meeting, chair Jon Lefebure indicates.

Recommendations for a sweeping baseline probe of the mill's airborne toxins, coupled with new air-dispersion modeling, surfaced during the CAF's Sept. 13 meeting at the Crofton Community Centre.


That's when a forum sub-committee reported what member Patti Bauer calls a "fundamental disconnect" between results from the NorskeCanada mill's 2004 study and a peer review commissioned by the Crofton Airshed Citizens' Group.

"People need time to read over recommendations then be ready to say if they support them or not," Lefebure said of the mill's study by the Jacques Whitford firm.

Debate on Oct. 18 will also focus on who would pay for the baseline study on human health-risk assessment.

"I recommended we decide first if it's (another baseline) a good idea, then we'd have to move the consideration to who we request to pay for it.

"It's one step at a time."

The mill funded Whitford's study titled a baseline study of air-quality and human risk assessment from mill air emissions.

However, Airshed scientists poked holes in Whitford's study, saying it fell short of risk assessment principals.

"I'll be very interested in the debate at the next meeting," Lefebure said of the CAF's next huddle.

"It's great having more information but there are costs and could that money be put to better use?"

The October meeting will also involve a presentation about airshed planning by the environment ministry's Warren McCormick.

The CAF - comprising a range of local residents - also awaits the findings of Vancouver Island Health Authority's Dr. Fred Rockwell concerning validity of Whitford's risk assessments.

"Rockwell has passed it along to an environmental specialist in Victoria," Lefebure said.

The CAF's recent meeting also covered use of a malfunctioning air-quality measuring unit during Whitford's study, Lefebure said.

"The anemometer wasn't functioning properly over periods of one year in 2004 so the results didn't make sense," he said.

The next public meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. on Oct. 18 in the Crofton Community Centre.

< Prev   Next >

This site donated by Charles Buchwald