Home arrow In the News arrow Norske ranked among nation’s top polluters
Main Menu
Home
Take Action!
Search
About Us
In the News
The Crofton Mill
Air Pollutants
Contact Us
Links
Press Centre
Documents and Reports
CACG Newsletter
Letters
Toxic Legacy of Federal Neglect
Pulp Pollution Primer
RWDI Peer Review
Senes Peer Review
Regulations?
Jacques Whitford Study
Air Quality Reports
Paprican Study on Dioxins
Interbeing and Paper
Risk Assessment
Transcripts
Best Technology for P&P:EC
Norske ranked among nation’s top polluters PDF Print E-mail
Gulf Islands Driftwood, June 1, 2005

Norske ranked among nation’s top polluters

By SEAN MCINTYRE
Staff Writer
Tensions relating to health concerns and emission levels are at a heightened state following the release last week of information ranking NorskeCanada’s Crofton Division as the eighth worst polluter in the nation.
The report, compiled with data from the National Pollutant Release Inventory and presented by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation, ranked 2,257 sites across the country based on total on-site releases.
Crofton division vice-president Don McKendrick acknowledged the Crofton facility was a large industrial operation but said a more accurate ranking would have Crofton placing around 50th position.
He said data interpretations failed to look at the overall picture and were largely based on modelled emissions levels.
“You can model until you’re blue in the face, but the rubber hits the road when you look at real measurements,” he said.
According to Michael Ableman of the Crofton Airshed Citizens Group (CACG), official estimates are conservative.
He advised people to look at the numbers and judge for themselves.
“This game has played out for too long,” he said. “It’s clear there’s a problem and I’d rather spend time working together on a solution than dealing with the spin.”
Information comes on the heels of a May 19 meeting in which scientists representing NorskeCanada admitted an assessment it released last year failed to adequately measure the health risks associated with emissions from the company’s Crofton facility.
“The peer review, along with these admissions from Norske and Jacques Whitford, that the study really doesn’t measure health risk, clearly highlights the need for a proper baseline study on air quality and health risks from the mill,” said Ableman.
The four-hour meeting held at the Crofton Community Centre featured scientist from both sides of the debate.
It was organized only weeks after a peer review conducted by scientists from Washington-based Pioneer Technologies and Vancouver’s RWDI found problems with the methodology of the Jacques Whitford study, the mill’s initial baseline study conducted in 2004.
McKendrick said that meeting and others like it scheduled for coming weeks are intended to help solve what has been a long-standing and divisive community issue.
Statistics are available online in the National Pollutant Release Inventory’s searchable database. It can be accessed via the Environment Canada website at www.ec.gc.ca.

< Prev   Next >

This site donated by Charles Buchwald