Home arrow Air Pollutants arrow CACG Letter to MWALP, Jan 25, 2004
Main Menu
Home
Take Action!
Search
About Us
In the News
The Crofton Mill
Air Pollutants
Contact Us
Links
Press Centre
Documents and Reports
CACG Newsletter
Letters
Toxic Legacy of Federal Neglect
Pulp Pollution Primer
RWDI Peer Review
Senes Peer Review
Regulations?
Jacques Whitford Study
Air Quality Reports
Paprican Study on Dioxins
Interbeing and Paper
Risk Assessment
Transcripts
Best Technology for P&P:EC
CACG Letter to MWALP, Jan 25, 2004 PDF Print E-mail
 Lists findings and demands. "It is unconscionable that NorskeCanada, a major industrial company which purports to be transparent and to have high environmental standards, should knowingly place populations at risk. MWLAP, as the regulatory agency, appears to be complicit through blind neglect."
Crofton Airshed Citizens Group
http://www.croftonair.org

January 25, 2004

The Minister
Water, Land and Air Protection
P.O. Box 9047, Stn. Prov Govt.
Victoria, B.C. V8K 9E2
fax: 250-387-1356

Dear Minister,

Re: NorskeCanada Crofton Mill

An overflow crowd of about 500 people attended the January 20th public meeting at the Crofton Community Center organized by the Crofton Airshed Citizens Group (CACG) to discuss toxic emissions from the NorskeCanada Crofton pulp and paper mill. The meeting included presentations from NorskeCanada, the Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection, an air emissions and toxics expert from the US, a representative of an environmental group specializing in pulp and paper issues, a physician, and myself.

People sat quietly listening without a break for three and a half hours. One by one a continuous line of citizens moved to the microphone, almost all of them expressing concern with NorskeCanada emissions. A young woman from Crofton asked to be reassured that her pregnancy would not be affected by pollution from the mill, a long-time Duncan physician questioned the ethics of carrying out a massive experiment with humans used unknowingly as lab rats; others demanded that the government do its job in overseeing and regulating the mill.  Media reports of the meeting can be found at www.croftonair.org. MWLAP will be receiving transcripts of the meeting as soon as they are available.

What was clear from that meeting is that citizens of this region have had enough, and that the time has come for their concerns in relation to the mill to be heard and acted upon.

The Company reports that every day approximately 24 million cubic meters of exhaust gasses come from the Crofton pulp mill, carrying with them a tonne of fine particulate matter, plus a tonne of volatile organic compounds. We have strong reason to believe that the actual numbers are considerably higher than those reported. The plume contains some of the most dangerous substances known to life: dioxins and furans, chlorine dioxide, formaldehyde, PCBs, hexavalent chromium,  in addition to large quantities of sulphur dioxide, nitrous oxides, carbon monoxide, hydrochloric acid,  and fine particulate matter. The latter, especially when associated with metals, is now known to be responsible for serious health impacts, including respiratory disease, strokes and heart attacks.

Seeing that cloud moving towards your home and your family as many of us do, smelling that acrid smell, experiencing burning eyes, breathing difficulties, subsequent headaches, and not really knowing, is a terrible thing. There is nothing worse than wondering what you will find out in five or ten or twenty years. Those very real experiences and concerns, we believe, are as valid a basis for precautionary action as is all of the research and scientific data we have been able to muster.

CACG was formed out of concern about Norske’s proposal to burn railway ties, coal, and tires, but our research revealed that the mill’s current practices are of serious concern. The following are a few things we discovered after analyzing existing data and consulting with experts in the fields of medicine, air emissions, industrial engineering, meteorology, and toxicology:

• There is no thorough independent baseline study in place on the mill’s current emissions and their health effects and therefore no way to determine whether a new fuel trial will improve air quality or make it worse.

• Power boiler #4 at the Crofton Mill, the subject of the current permit application, acts like a toxic waste incinerator, burning salt-laden bark, effluent treatment sludge and contaminated wood waste.

• Power boiler #4 is a gas boiler never designed for solid fuel. The residence time (the time the combustion products stay in the boiler) is too short to adequately break down toxic products. The boiler is antiquated, subject to upsets and ongoing problems. It cannot be depended on to safely burn current materials let alone treated railway ties, coal and tires.

• Power boiler #4 lacks adequate pollution controls. The electrostatic precipitator installed in 1991 and upgraded in 2001 has been described by technicians who have worked on it as “undersized”, “the cheapest the Company could find”, and as “never having functioned properly”.

• While higher temperatures could reduce emissions of dioxins and furans, emissions of other dangerous substances will increase as a result of adding the proposed new fuels. Thus we risk, at best, exchanging one set of toxic emissions for another—sulphur dioxide and heavy metals, including mercury, lead, hexavalent chromium, and zinc.

• Contaminated ash from the boilers is being transported on public roads in open trucks to an old, overflowing waste disposal site.

• Data used by the company to claim success in trials for these fuels in other mills have been called inconclusive and misleading by several independent experts who tell us that normal scientific protocol is absent, that averages based on anomalous numbers are used, and that key data are missing.


We believe that the relationship between Norske and this community should be guided and governed by the precautionary principle, language that is now central in the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, language that is the basis for the International Treaty on Persistent Organic Pollutants:

"When any activity raises threats of harm to the environment or human health, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically."

The key element of this principle is that it incites us to take anticipatory action in the absence of scientific certainty. In this context Norske who is the proponent of a polluting activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof. On that precautionary basis we demand the following:

• That the permit application for a trial to burn tires, railway ties and coal be denied outright by the Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection.

• That MWLAP investigate and review the content, process and enforcement of all NorskeCanada Crofton’s permits, including those relating to solid waste disposal.

• That an independent baseline study of air and water quality, and their health impacts, be produced for the communities surrounding the mill. The study to include computer modeling of the airshed, and soils testing of school playgrounds and agricultural lands.

• That permanent ambient air testing stations be expanded and upgraded in all of the communities in the airshed of the mill. And that a system be established to inform the public immediately when emissions are too high for health and safety so that residents can protect themselves.

• That an independently managed toll-free hotline be established for citizens in the region to report problems emanating from the mill. That those complaints, and how they were responded to, along with data from the ambient air testing stations, be published each week throughout the year by the papers in the region.

It is unconscionable that NorskeCanada, a major industrial company which purports to be transparent and to have high environmental standards, should knowingly place populations at risk. MWLAP, as the regulatory agency, appears to be complicit through blind neglect.
MWLAP’s mission states that it is “committed to protecting and enhancing the quality of British Columbia’s water, land, and air in a way that contributes to healthy communities”. We believe that the Ministry has not fulfilled its stated mission in regards to the Crofton Mill. We, the residents of the Crofton airshed will not rest until this matter is fully addressed.

We look forward to your immediate response.
Sincerely,

Michael Ableman for The Crofton Airshed Citizens Group

Cc    —Russell Horner, CEO NorskeCanada
—Jan Oskum, Chairman of the Board, NorskeCanada
—The Hon. David Anderson, Minister, Environment Canada


< Prev   Next >

This site donated by Charles Buchwald