Home arrow Air Pollutants arrow Michael Ableman's first letter, Driftwood, Dec. - Oxygen or Pulp? -
Main Menu
Home
Take Action!
Search
About Us
In the News
The Crofton Mill
Air Pollutants
Contact Us
Links
Press Centre
Documents and Reports
CACG Newsletter
Letters
Toxic Legacy of Federal Neglect
Pulp Pollution Primer
RWDI Peer Review
Senes Peer Review
Regulations?
Jacques Whitford Study
Air Quality Reports
Paprican Study on Dioxins
Interbeing and Paper
Risk Assessment
Transcripts
Best Technology for P&P:EC
Michael Ableman's first letter, Driftwood, Dec. - Oxygen or Pulp? - PDF Print E-mail


"... When we began asking questions, however, the color pictures and fairytale story began to unravel."
"...On the cover is a beautiful scene, photographed in golden evening light, of a young blond girl dancing in a pristine field of waist high grass. Beneath her are the words “what’s right”."
"...“What’s right” is that dioxins and furans and the long list of other dangerous substances being emitted by your facilities should never be produced in the first place, let alone spewed into the air that our children breathe."

Oxygen or Pulp?
by Michael Ableman

Years ago while researching our move to Salt Spring we queried a number of people on the island about emissions from the Crofton mill. The response was commonly “you should have seen it ten years ago” or “they’ve really cleaned up their act” or “its one of the cleanest pulp mills around”. In fact few people could tell me what the mill was putting out, and most folks preferred to believe that they were somehow not affected by it. After moving here we created our own form of denial imagining Stewart Channel as some sort of ocean barrier keeping us safe and separate from the mill.

Last week I attended the open house in Crofton sponsored by the Norske corporation to sell us on the idea of converting to what they call “alternative” fuels for use in their boilers. It was a well orchestrated event with cookies and quiches and little triangular sandwiches presented on doilies, slick color displays describing the stellar social, environmental and community record of the mill, and a full set of panels explaining all of the benefits that burning tires, railroad ties, and coal will bring us.

When we began asking questions, however, the color pictures and fairytale story began to unravel. We discovered that while this is being sold to us as some sort of environmental decision, the fuel conversion proposal is all about money, three million dollars in fuel savings per year, and as some believe, the first step towards the construction of a power substation at the mill. We discovered that there is no appropriate format for public input on this issue, that the time frame for public input was already almost over, and that there is no government regulation, only guidelines, with little government money or staff available for monitoring or oversight.

After the meeting several of us began the rather awkward process of researching something we knew nothing about. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence from residents of Crofton and beyond; of kids on the playing fields at Crofton schools regularly experiencing acute respiratory distress, of high cancer rates in the region, of dirty tactics on the part of the mill in timing more toxic releases at nighttime and on weekends, but without well researched scientific data I began to feel a bit unsure and somewhat hysterical.

So when an official from the ministry that oversees the mill privately told me that “there are catastrophic problems” with it I was concerned. When we discovered an independent air quality study revealing that Crofton regularly exceeds acceptable emission limits I was worried. When the November 27th national report showed that the Norske corporation operates three of the top ten highest polluting facilities in the entire country, and that pulp and paper mills are the worst polluters of Dioxins and Furans I got angry.

I came home with some souvenirs from my trip to the Norske open house. Along with the sandwiches and drinks, company staff were giving out three ring binders chock full of “data”, and tables were laden with color brochures describing the pulp and paper process. My favorite item from my trip to Crofton was a four color booklet titled “Norske Canada 2003 Accountability Reports” written for the company’s shareholders. On the cover is a beautiful scene, photographed in golden evening light, of a young blond girl dancing in a pristine field of waist high grass. Beneath her are the words “what’s right”. Inside the cover CEO Russel Horner presents his ideas of “what’s right” with a portrait of the company that uses words like honesty, leadership, values, principles, and responsibility sprinkled liberally throughout every paragraph.

There was no question mark after the words “what’s right” on the cover of that report, but I would like to add one on, and offer Norske some of my own thoughts and answers. “What’s right” is that in Norway, the country your company originated from, your Canadian facilities as they are currently operated, would never be able to open their doors do to strict health and environmental regulations. “What’s right” is that this is not, as one of your company staff presented it, about making a choice between jobs and human or environmental health, no one should ever be asked to make that choice. “What’s right” is that dioxins and furans and the long list of other dangerous substances being emitted by your facilities should never be produced in the first place, let alone spewed into the air that our children breathe. “What’s right” is that it is the birthright of every living thing to have access to good food, pure water, and clean air.

The week and a half since my “awakening” has been difficult, not just because of what I learned about the mill, but because I realized that our government is somewhat complicit in their activities, and that to forge a change we can only rely on the organized actions of folks like you and me. I also realized how much work we have to do to clean up our own act, at least those of us who burn wood for heat, drive automobiles, read newspapers and use paper. But what I realized is our biggest obstacle is our collective denial in the face of what appears to be overwhelming odds. For the moment I have been shaken out of that denial to help mobilize what must become a monumental action involving everyone who drinks water and breathes air. I believe that includes all of us.

As I looked again at the beautiful little girl dancing blissfully in the field on the cover of the Norske report I thought about my own two boys, 22 years old and two years old. We try to make healthy choices for them by growing our own food, filtering our drinking water, guiding and guarding them in any way that we can. But there is no choice when it comes to the air that we breathe. At the moment that choice is being made for us, by others, somewhere else, whose priorities are often not life, but profit. It is time to reclaim those choices and return them to their rightful place; to our families and our neighborhoods, and to the communities in which we live.

(To get involved: or (250-537-2616), or write or call Bernard Bintner at the Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection (250-751-3125), and request a response.)


Michael Ableman is a farmer, educator, and founder and executive director of the Center for Urban Agriculture at Fairview Gardens, based on one of the oldest organic farms in California. He is the author and photographer of From the Good Earth (Abrams, 1993) and On Good Land (Chronicle Books, 1998) and the subject of the PBS film Beyond Organic. Ableman is currently farming a small piece of land on Salt Spring Island and is at work on a new book profiling innovative farmers across North America.




< Prev

This site donated by Charles Buchwald