Home arrow Air Pollutants arrow Elizabeth White see "The Corporation"
Main Menu
Home
Take Action!
Search
About Us
In the News
The Crofton Mill
Air Pollutants
Contact Us
Links
Press Centre
Documents and Reports
CACG Newsletter
Letters
Toxic Legacy of Federal Neglect
Pulp Pollution Primer
RWDI Peer Review
Senes Peer Review
Regulations?
Jacques Whitford Study
Air Quality Reports
Paprican Study on Dioxins
Interbeing and Paper
Risk Assessment
Transcripts
Best Technology for P&P:EC
Elizabeth White see "The Corporation" PDF Print E-mail
Duncan News Leader - Your opinions
March 31, 2004

Can Norske prove it’s not Corporation material?Elizabeth White sees The Corporation - March 31 - " An independent baseline study of the mill’s emissions, including dispersion modeling, would tell us what the current risks are, and what the probable impact of the alternative fuels might be. In many parts of North America, such a study would be required before a permit was issued. What is Norske afraid of? "
   Duncan News Leader
Your opinions

March 31, 2004

Can Norske prove it’s not Corporation material?

Dear editor,

I had the opportunity to see The Corporation in Duncan.

The documentary describes how the fundamental legal structure of corporations is a root cause of many problems, including industrial pollution. The argument is made that, if the corporation is a person under the law, then that person shows all the clinical symptoms of a psychopath. The issues raised take us way beyond the politics of left and right and simplistic ‘good guys versus bad guys’ arguments.
The film really makes us question things we take for granted.

As I watched the film, I thought about our local corporation, NorskeCanada, and the Crofton mill. The film points out companies will continue to pollute until there is no longer a financial incentive to do so.

Fuel switching at the Crofton mill, from natural gas to coal, shredded tires and railway tires will reduce costs. But it could also increase the total burden of air pollutants, not reduce it.

I hope I am wrong, but the current round of public consultations Norske announced with much fanfare a month ago seems to me to be nothing but a public relations exercise, an elaborate opinion poll which the company will use to make, or justify, decisions with potentially serious public health impacts.

If Norske knows that its current and proposed air emissions are harmless, or at least pose a tolerable risk compared to the benefits the company provides, why does it not do what the Crofton Airshed Citizens Group has been asking for?

An independent baseline study of the mill’s emissions, including dispersion modeling, would tell us what the current risks are, and what the probable impact of the alternative fuels might be. In many parts of North America, such a study would be required before a permit was issued. What is Norske afraid of?

—Elizabeth White
Saltspring Island
 


< Prev   Next >

This site donated by Charles Buchwald