Home arrow In the News arrow Clearing the Air Over Crofton
Main Menu
Home
Take Action!
Search
About Us
In the News
The Crofton Mill
Air Pollutants
Contact Us
Links
Press Centre
Documents and Reports
CACG Newsletter
Letters
Toxic Legacy of Federal Neglect
Pulp Pollution Primer
RWDI Peer Review
Senes Peer Review
Regulations?
Jacques Whitford Study
Air Quality Reports
Paprican Study on Dioxins
Interbeing and Paper
Risk Assessment
Transcripts
Best Technology for P&P:EC
Clearing the Air Over Crofton PDF Print E-mail
CLEARING THE AIR OVER CROFTON

By Michael Ableman, Crofton Citizens Airshed Group

[appeared as op-ed piece in Times Colonist, July 17, 2004]

We are pleased that the upcoming Clean Air Concert has aroused so much attention. While many have expressed support of our efforts to clean up the air in the region, some are feeling threatened.

We are not trying to take away jobs, or close the mill, as some have suggested. We are trying to find out whether the Crofton Mill's emissions are affecting public health. Anecdotal evidence suggests that they are. If this is confirmed by independent scientific assessment, then we intend to work with the company and other stakeholders to improve the situation. Everyone has a birthright to clean air. We believe that no one should ever have to choose between their jobs and their health, they have a right to both.

Last January at a community meeting in Crofton, dozens of speakers rose to tell their stories about how they believe the mill is affecting their lives. Some can't breathe properly. Others get stinging eyes and headaches. Others worry when cleaning mill ash off their cars or decks what it may be doing to their lungs. Some are leaving town rather than raise their kids there.

Most disturbing , we discovered, is that there are no laws protecting us from dangerous air emissions. BC's regulations for air emissions are so lax, we might as well be living in a third world country. Mills must have a permit, but there are no legally binding standards for air quality to write into those permits. The permit for the Crofton mill regulates only four of dozens of harmful substances, it is almost 30 years old, and it was written at a time when much less was known about the effect of these substances on people's health.

Is there anyone who would not be concerned if they found out that their kid's asthma, or their partner's cancer, or their own heart disease was tied to pollutants coming from that mill? The problem is that we do not know. And so the Crofton Airshed Citizens Group is pursuing an independent scientific study to tell us what the impacts of the mill are. "Independent" means the study is not paid for, managed, and controlled by the polluters themselves. Rather than responding to the public’s demands to study and clean up it’s pollution, NorskeCanada has focused on cleaning up it’s image, but his is not a perception problem, it’s a pollution problem.

The National Pollution Release Inventory run by the Canadian government tells us that the exhaust gases leaving the Crofton mill each day carry with them a tonne of fine particulate matter, a tonne of volatile organic compounds, two tonnes of hydrochloric acid, three and a half tonnes of sulphur dioxide, one and a half tonnes of methanol, plus dioxins and furans, chlorine dioxide, formaldehyde, PCBs, and hexavalent chromium. Each of these substances is dangerous to human health.

Moreover, we know that the mill does not always operate under 'steady state' or optimum conditions. This is clear from the periodic fall out events, from very evident changes in the colour of the emissions, and from monitoring data provided by the company.

Our organization believes that the Crofton Mill should be guided by precaution, a principle now written into the environmental laws of every civilized country in the world including the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

"When any activity raises threats of harm to the environment or human health, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically."  The key element of this principle is that it incites us to take anticipatory action even in the absence of scientific certainty. The burden of proof should be on the company to prove that its emissions are safe, and not on citizens groups to prove that they are not.

It is no longer acceptable for any corporation to pollute. The technology exists to dramatically reduce harmful emissions. Sweden is pioneering closed-loop mills that recapture effluent and minimize emissions. There is no reason why Canadians cannot be as innovative as Swedes in solving problems, and why we should not be setting a goal for the eventual elimination of pollution altogether.

We believe that most people share our desire for cleaner air in the Crofton airshed. We want the upcoming concert to be a catalyst for community members, workers, the company, and government agencies to get together to find solutions.

< Prev   Next >

This site donated by Charles Buchwald