Home arrow Air Pollutants arrow Heavy Metals in Sludge Not Nutrients
Main Menu
Home
Take Action!
Search
About Us
In the News
The Crofton Mill
Air Pollutants
Contact Us
Links
Press Centre
Documents and Reports
CACG Newsletter
Letters
Toxic Legacy of Federal Neglect
Pulp Pollution Primer
RWDI Peer Review
Senes Peer Review
Regulations?
Jacques Whitford Study
Air Quality Reports
Paprican Study on Dioxins
Interbeing and Paper
Risk Assessment
Transcripts
Best Technology for P&P:EC
Heavy Metals in Sludge Not Nutrients PDF Print E-mail
To: Editor, Nanaimo NewsBulletin
October 17, 2007

I find it intriguing that Mr. Penner considers heavy metals like arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury to be "soil amendments" and "nutrients" when in fact they are deadly poisons.
See Environment Minister Responds on Sludge

According to agencies such as Health Canada, Environment Canada, US Center for Disease Control, Harvard University, University of Calgary, University of Kentucky, and the World Health Organization, heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier and destroy brain and nerve cells.  They cause immune disorders, cancers such as leiomyosarcoma and multiple myeloma, cardiovascular disease, dementia, kidney failure, hormone irregularities including infertility, fibromyalgia, depression, chronic fatigue, gastrointestinal disorders, +++.  (Mercury alone causes over 200 symptoms which multiply exponentially with every added heavy metal.)  

Heavy metals bio-accumulate--our bodies can't get rid of them so we accumulate more as we age--causing more symptoms and raising the cost of health care.  Heavy metals cross the placenta so mothers pass their heavy metals to their developing babies, then feed them metal-tainted breast milk.  

Environment Canada's National Pollution Release Inventory shows that in 2006, the Catalyst pulp mill in Crofton voluntarily reported "on-site releases to air and water" of 74.490 kg arsenic, 13.130 kg cadmium, 42.400 kg lead, and 1.230 kg mercury.  These "on-site releases to air and water" travel with wind currents, contaminating our soil and the crops we grow in it; the water we drink and the fish that live in it; and the air we breathe.  That's bad enough.  

In 2006, Catalyst's "on-site disposals to landfill" include 1.590 kg arsenic, 7.948 kg cadmium, 108.098 kg lead, and 0.016 kg mercury; "off-site disposals to landfill" include 404.574 kg arsenic, 28.362 kg cadmium, 900.907 kg lead, and 1.335 kg mercury.

In 2006, the Crofton mill released 2.5 kilos mercury; 1.5 kg of that into landfills.  An acute dose of 1-4 grams of mercuric chloride (mercury plus chlorine, which the mill also discharges) can kill a person within 24 hours.  The mill also released over 1.5 metric tonnes of lead alone; one tonne into landfills, aka "sludge" aka "soil amendments."  How can we worry about lead-painted toys from China when the greater threat to our health is right under (and inside) our noses?  

That's just one pulp mill in B.C.; others dump similar amounts.

After decades of discharging heavy metals directly into our air and oceans, Mr. Penner has just given pulp mills carte blanche to pollute our soils directly with heavy metal-contaminated sludge from overflowing landfills--and call it "soil amendments."  

True, Crofton mill's landfill sludge does contain trace elements found in fertilizer--but any gardener will tell you that an overdose of fertilizer will kill plants sooner than feed them (eg. 2006 total discharges:  83.5 tonnes of manganese, 9 tonnes of zinc, 146.6 tonnes of phosphorus, and 74 kg of hexavalent chromium, plus numerous noxious chemicals).  Which mill worker is going to hand-apply this heavy metal-contaminated "fertilizer" to individual plants to protect them from root burn--and at what cost to his/her health?  If mill effluent discharges into oceans kill sea life, why would these same compounds "improve soil conditions in agricultur[e] or forestry"?

A gardener would also know that if you dump lime on our acid-loving cedars, wild rhododendrons, salal, Oregon grape and Douglas firs, you'll "sweeten the soil" and kill the plants.  

Far from letting pulp mills further poison our soils, Mr. Penner, these polluters should be held responsible for destroying our environment--and our health--over their decades of lucrative operations.  
 
Christel Martin, B.G.S., C.T.M.
741 8255



Data from:
http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/querysite/facility_substance_summary_e.cfm?opt_npri_id=0000001266&opt_report_year=2006
< Prev   Next >

This site donated by Charles Buchwald