Home arrow Air Pollutants arrow BC Groups Protest Sludge Landspreading to Minister of Environment
Main Menu
Home
Take Action!
Search
About Us
In the News
The Crofton Mill
Air Pollutants
Contact Us
Links
Press Centre
Documents and Reports
CACG Newsletter
Letters
Toxic Legacy of Federal Neglect
Pulp Pollution Primer
RWDI Peer Review
Senes Peer Review
Regulations?
Jacques Whitford Study
Air Quality Reports
Paprican Study on Dioxins
Interbeing and Paper
Risk Assessment
Transcripts
Best Technology for P&P:EC
BC Groups Protest Sludge Landspreading to Minister of Environment PDF Print E-mail
September 14, 2007

Hon. Barry Penner
Minister of the Environment
Legislative Buildings
Victoria, BC V8V 1X4

Dear Minister Penner,

The Soil Amendment Code of Practice, recently passed and effective as of September 1, 2007 will facilitate the land-spreading of industrial toxic waste, including pulp mill sludge, fly ash and domestic and industrial sewage and water treatment sludge. We urge you to immediately reverse this decision and not allow any further spreading of hazardous industrial waste on B.C.’s farms and forests.

Industrial waste treatment and domestic sewage treatment result in sludge containing the harmful substances removed from liquid waste before treated effluent is returned to the environment. It is therefore incomprehensible that this toxic sludge can be referred to as ‘beneficial’ for ‘soil amendment’ or why it is considered appropriate to return the removed toxins to watershed lands, where they will inevitably end up polluting clean water in the environment. Similarly, fly ash is captured by pollution prevention equipment on combustion facilities in order to prevent the release of toxic particulates into the atmosphere. The deliberate application of these captured toxins to animal grazing and food producing lands, as well as to watershed lands, is unacceptable.

There has been no comprehensive analysis of pulp mill sludge to identify all the potentially harmful chemicals it contains, and the required analysis of the sludge (per section 6) is inadequate. Since we are not fully aware of all the chemicals that could be in sludge, it is impossible to conclude that the sludge is safe simply because dangerous toxins have not been adequately screened for. We do know, however, that pulp mill sludge includes a range of heavy metals, benzenes and phenolics. Both industrial sludge and domestic sewage sludge can contain a wide array and variability of bacterial and chemical contaminants, including pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting chemicals, extremely harmful to human and environmental health. Many of these chemicals could have persistent effects on food-growing soil lasting well beyond the 38 months designated as the maximum time before planting food crops.

There has been no assessment of the impacts on wildlife of dumping hazardous waste in farms, fields and forests. Wildlife do not read ‘No Trespassing’ signs and nor do they refrain from ingesting food sources from these lands for any designated period.

There is significant history to the issue of landspreading pulp mill sludge and we refer you back to previous efforts to allow virtually unregulated landspreading. Environmental concerns that were raised then remain today unaddressed. The current Code of Practice is even weaker than the previously proposed regulations. It allows a wider range of industrial sources, it has an extremely limited list of chemical parameters for testing, and a severely flawed process with no allowance for any compliance monitoring or enforcement. BC citizens have no recourse as truckloads of sludge are dumped in their communities.

Studies have been completed on alternatives for disposal of sewage and sludge, and we encourage you to put efforts into these rather than continuing to promote the application of sludge to agricultural land. The direct application of untreated waste has not been proven to be safe, while other options have been shown to be viable from an economic, technical and regulatory perspective.  In particular, the use of technologies that can recover resources from sludge – including water, heat and biofuel – should be investigated and put into place to avoid future pollution of our waters from sludge land application.

Minister, we urge you to be guided by the Precautionary Principle in this matter and order thorough testing and consideration by independent scientists. Industrial waste needs to be contained as we work towards cleaner production, not spread by the truckload throughout the province.

Jay RitchlinDavid  Suzuki Foundation   
Stuart Blundell   Pulp and Paper Workers of Canada
Lisa Matthaus Sierra Club of Canada   
Andrea Reimer Wilderness Committee
Christianne Wilhelmson Georgia Strait Alliance   
Pat Reichert Island Natural Growers
Tzeporah Berman Forest Ethics   
Steve Lawson First Nations Environmental Network
Delores Broten Reach for Unbleached   
Robert Wiltzen Crofton Airshed Citizens Group
Mae Burrows Labour Environment Alliance Society   
Samuel Godfrey Islands Organic Producers Association
    
    
cc. Shane Simpson, NDP Environment critic

Click Here to write your own letter to the Minister of Environment

or Click Here to read more about this issue
< Prev   Next >

This site donated by Charles Buchwald