Home arrow Press Centre arrow COAL TRIAL AT HOWE SOUND MILL POISONS COAST
Main Menu
Home
Take Action!
Search
About Us
In the News
The Crofton Mill
Air Pollutants
Contact Us
Links
Press Centre
Documents and Reports
CACG Newsletter
Letters
Pulp Pollution Primer
RWDI Peer Review
Senes Peer Review
Regulations?
Jacques Whitford Study
Air Quality Reports
Paprican Study on Dioxins
Interbeing and Paper
Risk Assessment
Transcripts
Best Technology for P&P:EC
COAL TRIAL AT HOWE SOUND MILL POISONS COAST PDF Print E-mail
July 11, 2007                                                        
 
The Port Mellon Pulp Mill at Howe Sound is the latest of BC's pulp mills to burn coal for fuel, despite degraded air quality and increased greenhouse gas emissions.  Howe Sound Pulp and Paper commenced an initial trial burning of 1,000 tones of coal for a week in February 2007.

According to Ministry of Environment staff, no permit amendment or authorization was required for the trial since the mill's current permit does not disallow burning coal, or any other fuel. The permit specifies only that the pollution must be acceptable to the Regional Waste Manager of MoE.

"Apparently skyrocketing particulate matter, increased sulphur dioxide, and dioxins emissions above Canada Wide Standards are acceptable to MoE," said Rob Wiltzen of Crofton Airshed Citizens Group. "The results from the first trial are not encouraging but the mill tells us that they are not valid in any case. The logic for allowing a further expanded trial is simply impenetrable."

On May 28, 2007, Howe Sound Pulp and Paper commenced a nine-month trial, burning unspecified volumes of coal. In a memo obtained from the Ministry of Environment by environmental groups, the mill maintains that the high particulate matter and organics test results (dioxins, furans, PAH's, HCB's) from the first trial would not be typical when burning coal, but were due to mechanical failure.

"There are horrendous consequences to the use of coal in B.C's pulp mills, and the absolute absence of public process clearly demonstrates the lack of regard for human and environmental health," said Delores Broten, Senior Policy Advisor of Reach for Unbleached (RFU). "This appears to be yet another example of complete abdication by the province of their regulatory mandate. The mills are lining up to burn coal and our monitoring and enforcement authority, oblivious to higher emissions and inconclusive test results, just lets it happen. Where does public health and environmental protection enter the equation?"
Apart from the greenhouse gas implications, the use of coal raises human health concerns because of mercury and heavy metals emissions, increased particulate matter linked to respiratory illnesses, and a range of organic toxins. An application to burn coal at Crofton was withdrawn in 2004 after citizens protested vociferously.

     “Without proper monitoring and reporting, it is impossible to determine the impacts of burning coal on air quality.  A trial implies an experiment with scientific controls and clear 'before' and 'after' measurements when you change conditions," said Wiltzen.  "What has been provided by Howe Sound Pulp and Paper falls far short of anything to suggest that this is a trial."

        Monitoring concerns could be addressed if Canada adopted European procedures for continuous sampling technology for persistent pollutants and metals testing from stacks. Recent efforts to introduce such technology in British Columbia have been stymied by Environment Canada, which has refused to endorse a proposal put forward by an unusual alliance of industry and environmental groups to test German continuous sampling equipment on Catalyst's Crofton division power boiler stack. 

"Our members on the Sunshine coast are concerned about emissions of mercury, fluoride and greenhouse gases," said Broten. "We do not see any serious attempt at testing or monitoring this switch to coal, which is a much more polluting fuel, nor any attempt at all to capture greenhouse gas emissions, as the Premier promised about any new use of coal."
Of utmost concern to locals is that the Howe Sound coal trial may take local fish off the menu for good. A recent study by aquatic ecologist Asit Mazumder of the University of Victoria found that mercury levels in lake small-mouth bass and ocean rockfish caught on or around Vancouver Island already exceed, by up to twice, Health Canada safety guidelines. It is likely that the Sunshine Coast, also on the Strait of Georgia, would show similar results. Mercury contamination results from burning coal. Mercury spewed into the atmosphere falls into fresh and salt water, where bacteria transform it into highly toxic methylmercury, which then works its way up the food chain.

"While the world wakes up to pollution and climate change, Howe Sound Pulp and Paper seems determined to do what it can to speed up the climate crisis in the name of the bottom line," said Wiltzen.

Next >

This site donated by Charles Buchwald